Company Profile (AI Text)
Name: Zero Cheating
Canonical URL: https://wefunder.com/zero.cheating
Updated at: 2026-06-02T05:01:17Z

Tagline: AI Is Replacing Education. Our Patented Solution Stops the Collapse.
Elevator pitch: Students are cheating during online proctored exams by using their phones outside the webcam view or having another person in the room. Zero Cheating prevents these methods of cheating with patent-pending technology - a wide angled webcam viewing the entire student's body and surrounding desk area plus a 360 degree motion sensor.

Key claims:
- Total raised on Wefunder: 780550 | citation: https://wefunder.com/zero.cheating#claim-total-raised
- Total investors: 92 | citation: https://wefunder.com/zero.cheating#claim-total-investors

Verified facts:
- Total raised on Wefunder: 780550 | observed_at: 2026-06-02T05:01:17Z | expires_at: 2026-06-03T05:01:17Z
- Total investors: 92 | observed_at: 2026-06-02T05:01:17Z | expires_at: 2026-06-03T05:01:17Z

Computed metrics:
- total_amount_raised: 780550
- total_investors: 92
- team_size: 2
- featured_investor_count: 2
- faq_count: 3
- recent_post_count: 0

Quick facts:
- Patented AI Exam Proctoring: Detects cheating in exams and remote interviews. | citation: https://wefunder.com/zero.cheating#claim-fact-1
- Proven Demand: Piloted in 12+ institutions, securing strong adoption and real-world results. | citation: https://wefunder.com/zero.cheating#claim-fact-2
- Powerful Monitoring: Detects unauthorized devices, including earbuds and ChatGPT use. | citation: https://wefunder.com/zero.cheating#claim-fact-3
- Expert-Led Team: 10+ educators bring deep insights on academic integrity. | citation: https://wefunder.com/zero.cheating#claim-fact-4
- High-Margin SaaS: Scalable model with near 100% gross margins, priced per student. | citation: https://wefunder.com/zero.cheating#claim-fact-5
- Academic Support: Backed by Yale professor who invested 125,000 and piloted the software | citation: https://wefunder.com/zero.cheating#claim-fact-6

FAQ:
- Q: How do you compare to Proctor360 which has a 360 degree camera and is live?
  A: Hi Adam, Great question, here are the differences 1. We use a separate downloadable browser which allows us 100% flexibility and control in terms of preventing advanced cheating such as HDMI ports, casting, blue tooth, face video feeds, running a virtual machine, etc. 2. We use a patent-pending mobile app to verify identity with biometrics as opposed to matching the webcam view to a student ID photo. This existing method is not accurate and leads to many false flags and if someone looks simil...
- Q: If the camera stops working in the middle of exam, how you tackle that?
  A: The system silently switches to using the built-in computer webcam and flags the exam for the instructor to review the remaining video. All the other software protections remain. Since the student is unaware of the situation, they will not suddenly start cheating. Again, Zero Cheating positions itself as preventing the student from cheating since they know they can't get around our system. Thus, as long as the student is unaware of the issue, they will continue to take the exam without cheati...
- Q: What are the economics of your system? Is the camera and software sold or leased and at what price/cost? When will the results of your pilots be made known? Do you plan to do an upgrade to your system based on results from the pilots? If so, how long will that take?
  A: We don’t publicly share our revenue model and cost structure to maintain a competitive edge, but here’s what we can say: Our camera system is sold, not leased, and our software operates on a freemium model, allowing schools to transition to paid licenses after pilots. Right now, multiple schools are actively using the system in pilot programs, and we’re in ongoing discussions with them about long-term adoption. We plan to share pilot results in Q2 2024, covering adoption, feedback, and overal...