# Sometimes, what they REFUSE to say, speaks LOUDEST

- Canonical URL: https://wefunder.com/feed/278211
- Entity ID: wefunder:feed_item:278211
- Published at: 2026-03-18 20:54:43 UTC
- Updated at: 2026-03-23 19:39:37 UTC

## Author
Howard Marks

## Subject
UNFIT TOO

## Content
We can really summarize everything about the sticky and dangerous situation America is in, by two questions during the Tulsi Gabbard hearings - and it's worth noting that Gabbard danced around both of these questions and offered no answer. Every one of us needs to take this in. This is our PREDICAMENT. I realize this is the third post I've made since we launched this campaign, and like the other two, it revolves partly around on the Iran War. This is only because it's so relevant and of the moment. One question asked of Gabbard was whether Intelligence advised Trump that if Iran was attacked, they'd very likely close the Strait of Hormuz as a retaliatory tactic. (Of course they did!) Gabbard stammered and evaded the question in her non-response. The other question was whether Intelligence had affirmatively determined that Iran posed an imminent nuclear threat prior to the attack. (Of course they did not!) This question, laid out brilliantly by Jon Ossoff, SHOWED that Intel HADN'T done so, and Gabbard was trapped. Her way of dealing with this, was to say that only the President has the ability to determine what threats are imminent. Yeah, right. Ossoff nailed her in his response, but then - she stayed awkwardly silent. Let's process that silence. We're IN a freakin' war. The Strait of Hormuz IS freakin' closed; this IS strangling supply. It IS increasing price. Moreover, allies have uniformly REFUSED to put their troops in harm's way to help Trump navigate ships through the Strait. And moreover, the top aide to Gabbard - the cabinet official testifying - just resigned BECAUSE, he said, there was NO imminent nuclear threat leading to the attack. Despite the obviousness of these REALITIES, the choice made by Gabbard was to sit there and look dumb rather that buck Trump, to sit there and deny what her Intelligence showed, rather than put it forth. In other words - she chose to protect her fealty to Trump over her oath to America and the Constitution, during war. What this shows, is that we have a President WHOSE PATHOLOGY DEMANDS that fealty to him be protected EVEN WHEN it hurts America, its people, allies, and the world, in a significant and obvious way, and EVEN WHEN all that pain is directly attributable to HIS screw-up. Trump's recklessness is borne from that pathology. Trump's fixation at projecting infallibility, is pathological. For Gabbard to sit there and be silent - I don't think there's anything in recent memory that's more un-American than for an official in such a key post to pander to a madman. THE PUNCH LINE is that this is a midterm election year. And Trump's pathology - which creates the dynamic that led to Gabbard's disingenuousness - NEEDS to be put out there!!! Who is going to do it? As the midterms approach, Dems will mostly speak to the economy, inflation, jobs, deficit, and some will speak to other issues (like immigration) which are asked about in every political poll. Do the polls EVER ask about Trump's stability, decline, or pathology - NO, NEVER! Legacy media won't focus much on it either. It has to be Independent Media with potential to cross over. And THIS is why we're making the film UNFIT TOO. Because the PREDICAMENT that we're in - the underlying cause of THE predicament we're REALLY in - IS pathological, and that message is not out there much at all, and it NEEDS to be - truthfully, by experts; science above partisanship; Democracy is on the line. Thanks for reading and thanks for your support.